Before deciding on a Lifeline service provider, here are a few things to consider. First of all, you should find a lifeline service provider that is licensed in your area. The FCC should also approve lifeline service providers. The FCC will oversee providers that offer these services, and you can file a formal complaint if you are unhappy. However, if you find that a Lifeline service provider is not licensed in your area, you can opt to change providers. This is the fastest way to switch providers since you will not need to cancel your original service.
Reclassification of broadband internet access service
Broadband Internet Access Service is a Title II telecommunications service regulated under the Federal Communications Act. While the Federal Communications Commission has the power to regulate these services under Title II, it has declined to apply net neutrality rules to these exchange arrangements. Nevertheless, it retains its authority to hear interconnection disputes under Section 201 and 202 of the Communications Act and the related enforcement provisions.
The FCC’s interpretation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act is at odds with the deregulation purposes of the law, as it fails to account for differences between traditional telecommunications services and the Internet. Broadband access is so inseparably linked with conventional telecommunications services that it warrants extensive “common carrier” regulation to ensure fair treatment of all traffic. However, industry groups have challenged the FCC’s authority to reclassify broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service.
The FCC’s reclassification of broadband Internet access services as a telecommunications service provides more statutory justification for policies related to the technology. It will protect consumers by giving ISPs more freedom to implement new features. The Commission’s decision also means fewer federal regulations for ISPs, allowing them to charge higher prices to provide more bandwidth.
Impact on the digital divide
Access to computers and the internet has created a digital divide. More than 23 million Americans lack access to broadband service at home, and older age is another factor in fewer households with high-speed internet. This divide impacts connected health technology access, which might further exacerbate social, educational, and employment disparities. There are several solutions to address this situation.
Closing the digital divide requires a new kind of service. Lifeline service providers are helping the poor connect to the internet. The federal government funded the program. If a lifeline service provider can help reduce the digital divide, it could be an effective way to promote economic growth. Many of these plans have limited or no impact on actual internet access.
To close the digital divide, government agencies must work with stakeholders, including nonprofits, healthcare providers, and internet service providers. Government entities and nonprofits must remain impartial. It is not just about money but also how the program is implemented.
Existence of state oversight of Lifeline providers
One question lingering for years is whether the FCC has enough oversight of Lifeline service providers. The FCC recently issued new orders intended to crack down on waste and fraud, but there have been complaints and even investigations into the program. The existence of state oversight of Lifeline providers is essential in light of these allegations. In addition to state oversight, the FCC should consider enacting legislation that would require lifeline service providers to report fraud and abuse.
In addition, there are concerns about the lack of transparency in the Lifeline program. In 2014, the FCC approved changes to the program to help ensure that consumers don’t lose access to telephone or broadband services. These changes will ensure that Lifeline service providers meet minimum standards and offer more flexibility for consumers. For example, the FCC will no longer charge late fees for non-payment of service charges. It will also ease specific documentation requirements for Lifeline applicants.
While these changes may sound good, some states still prefer to retain their existing rules and regulations. For example, the Wireline Competition Bureau has granted the Vermont Department of Public Service permission to participate in the National Lifeline Accountability Database (NLAD). Although these plans are not yet final, they are essential steps in the ongoing process. The FCC has been obligated to review and approve compliance plans before approving new carriers. Those who have not completed their programs may need to use a third party to verify their eligibility.
